The global warming has a lot of great impact on our planet. It warn people of the dangerous of global warming, and show them by some pictures how the world will look after few years. In this essay I am will write about two reviews that I found about the global warming movie which is called "An Inconvenient Truth". One of the reviews is giving positive points about the movie while the other one is shows us the negative points.
First I will start with the positive points about Al Gore's movie. One of the good points that the writer talks about is that the science is laid out flawlessly. Unlike some environmentalists. He never cosily assumes that we're with him in accepting the theory, and instead lays out the evidence piece by comprehensible piece to build to a conclusion that hard to fault. Another good point is that he presents saving the planet as a moral, cross-party, worldwide issue rather than casting stones at the current US administration. Other good point is that he is not to say that the film is flawless. "An Inconvenient Truth" is conveniently soft on its examination of the Clinton-Gore administration’s less than glowing record on the environment, trumpeting Gore’s achievements in office rather than saying the laws which led to an explosion in the popularity of gas-guzzling SUVs.
Turning to the other review which is negative points where the writer wrote several points about the movie. One of the points is that the writer said that the movie was talking about Al Gore and his life more than the main subject which is the global warming. Other point is that he was still present in the movie are the jokes against Bush and other Republicans. Another point is that the writer says that Al Gore shows many pictures and evidences of global warming effects on the nature, but he never proved that the picture are real or not.
To sum up, in my opinion, I think that Al Gore's movie is good movie and it helps us to understand the real situation and to take it seriously by saving our planet.
No comments:
Post a Comment